
Louis
N. Teti, LL.M.
Original Article with analysis of Misconceptions #16 and
#15 - "Top
16" List of Common Misconceptions in Estate Planning- Highlighting Misconceptions
16 and 15
Analysis of Misconceptions #14 and #13 - "Top
16" List of Common Misconceptions in Estate Planning - Highlighting Misconceptions
14 and 13
Our June newsletter included my article entitled the "Top 16" List of
Common Misconceptions in Estate Planning. Here is a further analysis
of Misconceptions #12 and #11.
Misconception #12:
"We own everything jointly as husband and wife, so there is no need to worry about a Will until one of us dies."
Estate planning involves an extensive review of all
of your assets, not only to determine the current value of those assets,
but also how the assets are titled. Title to an asset can defeat a person's
intentions as stated in their Will. For example, if an asset is owned
jointly between a husband and wife as "tenants by the entireties", this
means that upon the first spouse's death the asset passes automatically,
by operation of law, to the surviving spouse. That asset does not pass
through the deceased spouse's Will, even if the Will gives the deceased
spouse's estate to someone other than the surviving spouse.
In smaller
estates, where there are no significant Federal Estate Tax issues, holding
assets as husband and wife is sometimes advisable if the clients want
the surviving spouse to own everything at the first spouse's death and,
more importantly, to enable the surviving spouse to control the ultimate
disposition of the asset. However, in cases where the estate will be subject
to the Federal Estate Tax, holding assets jointly is not always advisable,
and is frequently ill-advised. In order to maximize Federal Estate Tax
savings, each spouse needs to create his or her own individual estate
so as to protect up to $2 million (the current Federal Estate Tax exemption),
thus protecting a total of $4 million as opposed to a single $2 million
exemption. Holding everything jointly will not enable the married couple
to accomplish this goal.
There are other forms of joint ownership, including
joint tenants with the right of survivorship (between persons other than
spouses) and tenants in common. Survivorship assets automatically pass
to the surviving joint tenant. If an asset is held by two or more persons
as "tenants in common", then each person's portion of the jointly-held
asset will pass in accordance with the provisions of that person's Will
at his or her death, and not necessarily to the surviving joint tenant.
Again, when you are do your estate planning, it is critical to examine
the manner in which you own assets. Joint ownership is not always the
answer.
Misconception #11:
"We have a lot of life insurance, but since insurance is not taxable,
there is no need to worry about doing any tax planning for that particular
asset."
Wrong! Although life insurance proceeds are not taxable to the recipient
for income tax purposes, those proceeds are included in the taxable estate
of the owner of the policy for Federal Estate Tax purposes. There are
ways to avoid this significant Federal Estate Tax problem, by placing
the ownership of the policy in the name of a person or entity other than
the insured.
Life insurance proceeds are not taxable for Pennsylvania Inheritance
Tax purposes. However, in estates of over $2 million, the addition of
life insurance proceeds to the taxable estate for Federal Estate Tax purposes
can cause as much as 45% of the insurance proceeds to be paid to the Internal
Revenue Service, unless proper irrevocable trust tax planning is implemented.
Irrevocable trusts involve careful planning techniques, careful completion
of the life insurance application and beneficiary designation, payment
of the premiums by the Trustee (not the insured), and notification of
the trust beneficiaries of their right to withdraw their share of any
gifts that the insured may make to the trust to pay the insurance premiums.
Again, all tricky details which require careful and professional attention.
Regardless of any death tax issues relating to life insurance, you should
always be aware of how the beneficiary designations on your life insurance
policies are arranged. Have you named a contingent beneficiary, who would
take in the event the primary beneficiary is deceased? Don't assume that
you know whom you have named as beneficiaries on your life insurance!
Review these designations periodically, and update them from time to time
to be sure that your current intentions are accurately reflected.
Click here to view
the author's biography.
MacElree Harvey
17 West Miner Street
Post Office Box 660
West Chester, PA 19381–0660
p | 610.436.0100
f | 610.430.7885
f | 610.429.4486
e | info@macelree.com
The following article is informational only and
not intended as legal advice.
Speak with a licensed attorney about your own specific situation.
© Copyright 2007 MacElree Harvey, Ltd. All rights reserved.
|